The Carnival cruise line was founded over 50 years ago and controls 42% of the global cruise market. The company has had problems with injuries and crimes aboard its ships. As a result, it has had to deal with a large number of lawsuits. Nevertheless, the company has devised ways to minimize liability. This is where a carnival cruise line lawsuit comes in. Here’s what you need to know. To get the best possible result in your case, you must hire a qualified attorney.
One such lawsuit has been filed by Philip Charvat, whose father, Lucio Gonzalez, contracted COVID-19.
He was hooked up to a ventilator and died in the hospital on March 27, 2020. His family is suing Carnival Corp. and Princess Cruise Lines. They claim that the company failed to warn them about the virus. It’s not clear when the Carnival cruise line filed the lawsuit, but it’s not unlikely.
Lucio Gonzalez, a Florida man who boarded a Carnival ship in February 2016, developed COVID-19 shortly after he boarded the vessel. He passed away before his family could say goodbye. The plaintiffs claimed the cruise line failed to take effective measures to prevent the virus from spreading on board. A judge ruled in favor of the families and found that Carnival’s statements were not misleading or materially false. If you want to know more about the lawsuit, read the full court filing.
A second Carnival cruise line lawsuit aimed at preventing future cases of COVID-19 has been dismissed.
In this lawsuit, the cruise line was sued by a man named Philip Charvat. He claims that Carnival illegally called consumers and asked them to pay fees to avoid getting sick. Then the company kept the money as profit. The consumer didn’t give their consent, and some even complained to the Federal Trade Commission. The cruise line has also filed a countersuit against this lawsuit.
The court found that the statements from Carnival were not misleading. The company had made the statement to increase its chances of avoiding the outbreaks. Nevertheless, many passengers were affected and died. The lawsuit also states that the company acted based on inaccurate information. The Court found that the company had the responsibility to rectify the issues that were caused by the outbreaks. Aside from reversing the company’s conduct, this case also claims that the employees were not responsible for the deaths of passengers.
Although the company denied the allegations, the court found that the statements made by the company are not misleading.
The company made the statement on March 4, 2020, and it said that a cluster of COVID-19 cases in northern California had been linked to the outbreak. Moreover, 21 passengers aboard the Carnival ship tested positive for COVID-19 in less than two days. These findings led to the lawsuit. The judge also found that the statements were not materially false.
The plaintiffs claimed that Carnival had not adequately disclosed the risk of the COVID-19 virus. The company had also denied the CDC’s findings. The court found that the claims of the passenger were not credible. The plaintiffs were not able to prove that Carnival had not informed them about the COVID-19 outbreak. The complaint was based on the facts of the case, which proved to be unreliable. The court said that the health disclosures of the company were unconvincing.
The court ruled that Carnival did not make any materially false or misleading statements in its advertising and on the website of the company.
The company denied that it had concealed the fact that the virus had killed a Texas couple. The court also found that the company was aware of the risk and made efforts to prevent it. However, it failed to inform the passengers of the risks. The claim against the cruise company was not successful, but it has triggered a debate in the industry.
Another case filed by passengers against Carnival cruise line stated that the cruise line had not disclosed the risk of COVID-19 to the public. Its claims were not materially false because the company did not disclose the risk of the disease. The court also found that the company had not provided the plaintiffs with accurate information regarding the COVID-19. The plaintiffs had stated that they would have filed a lawsuit if they knew of the risks.
