In the first mesh bladder sling lawsuit, Johnson & Johnson paid nearly $117 million in a multistate settlement. Last year, Becton Dickinson settled another case, this time for $60 million. The sling is widely used, but many women have experienced serious complications. The company says that it has taken steps to protect patients. Some companies, like Becton, paid for education for doctors about the risks of using the bladder sling. The lawsuits filed against the two largest manufacturers are still ongoing.
The FDA and the manufacturers of mesh have been accused of misleading physicians and patients.
They failed to test the product adequately before launching it on the market, and they did not properly warn physicians and patients of its risks. Patients have suffered from pelvic organ prolapse because of multiple failures of the mesh. Consequently, multiple surgeries must be performed to replace each failed mesh, increasing the mental and physical stress involved. However, the lawsuits continue.
Several cases have been filed against manufacturers of pelvic mesh. The Washington state case has been the biggest so far. In 2007, Christine Scott was awarded $120 million. She had a TVT-O device implanted, and underwent multiple revision surgeries. But the extra medical procedures did not help and she was left with permanent, irreparable damage. Her husband and children sued Ethicon, and in January 2019, they settled with the company for $41 million. This includes another $1 million for the loss of consortium.
There is no clear consensus about what risks are acceptable with mesh implants.
The federal Food and Drug Administration has concluded that transvaginal mesh does not provide any benefit over other procedures. The FDA has also ordered the manufacturers to conduct additional studies. The companies have agreed to settle these claims, but the lawsuits may continue. And it is unlikely that any will be settled. It is important to remember that no one is forced to accept the claims. The plaintiffs are seeking compensation for the devastation they have suffered.
The case has been consolidated in several other states, such as Washington. The plaintiffs have presented compelling evidence that the manufacturers failed to warn doctors and patients of the risks of pelvic mesh. The Washington court has found that the risks are high and the product is faulty. In addition to this, the FDA has rescinded the award. As a result, the patient can sue for damages. For instance, the manufacturer did not warn her of the risks associated with transvaginal mesh.
Although the company is paying for the surgeries, it should not pay for the loss of consortium.
The woman may be able to file a lawsuit against the company that implanted her with a mesh bladder sling, but the company has yet to pay the damages. The women in the case received an award of $41 million. The award included $1 million for pain and suffering due to the implant. These two lawsuits were filed against the same company.
Another mesh bladder sling lawsuit focuses on the risk of infection. This product is deemed to be a frightful and dangerous device. The risk of infection is also high. The FDA has warned that the product should not be used in pregnant women. While the device is safe to use, the FDA has not been able to prove its safety. As a result, the company should pay medical expenses that are incurred due to the defect.
In Washington State, doctors are worried about the mesh bladder sling lawsuits, but the attorney’s general office has said it does not aim to stop the slings.
The slings were allegedly defectively-designed. The manufacturer failed to test the product before launching it. The FDA also did not properly warn patients and healthcare providers about the risks. The slings are not intended to cause pain, but many women have reported physical pain and the need for corrective surgery.
Unfortunately, mesh bladder sling lawsuits are being filed nationwide against Coloplast Corp. and other manufacturers of pelvic mesh products. These products have been proven to cause serious complications in thousands of women. In addition, the product’s safety has been called into question by state government agencies. They have also been criticized by physicians for not following instructions. They often cause significant pain, bleeding, and can lead to permanent damage.